To your likelihood of making out to your address, there clearly was a life threatening communications anywhere between grandiose narcissism and you may participant sex, ? = .161, t = 2.819, p = .005. So it communication is actually shown in Fig dos. The simple hills for males (simple hill = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you may females (effortless slope = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) weren’t significant. Grandiose narcissists failed to share an increased likelihood of making out having an attached address more than just a single one (? = .068, t = step 1.127, p = .261), suggesting you to grandiose narcissism wasn’t regarding the partner poaching having a preliminary-label fling.

Grandiose narcissists have a tendency to declaration lover poaching -particularly for the new brief-title . Yet not, a concern remains as to whether or not they find people in matchmaking a great deal more worth seeking than those people who are single. Widman and you can McNulty reason why grandiose narcissistic tendencies might possibly be triggered all over points typically (like the self-declaration out-of life incidence out of sexual decisions), although not be triggered whenever listed in a specific state. Thus, you’ll be able you to definitely grandiose narcissists divulge a track record of entertaining in companion poaching, but never fundamentally see those who work in matchmaking is better friends. We checked-out it opportunity in four studies.

Partner poaching inventory.

For long-title mate poaching, grandiose narcissism try a significant predictor for females (? = .306, t = 2.623, p = .010) and you can a somewhat tall predictor for males (? = .218, t = step one.725, p = .088). Not one of the Large Four details had been high. Grandiose narcissism Over 50 dating site wasn’t a critical predictor away from achievement at the poaching with the enough time-label for men (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), nevertheless try for females (? = .340, t = dos.369, p = .021). None of the other variables were extreme apart from ladies neuroticism; when lady have been so much more neurotic, they advertised far more achievement from the poaching for some time-term intimate relationships.

Abilities

Interesting, grandiose narcissism wasn’t in the spouse poaching among men. That it result is in keeping with overall performance said by Kardum and you can associates . Thus, you are able you to definitely grandiose narcissistic women are with greater regularity accountable out of mate poaching.

Content and you will techniques

There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.